US govt policy at work

AIDS prevention efforts are being undermined by spending restrictions in US foreign aid the Washington Post reports today. Despite years of evidence showing that tied aid is less effective than untied aid (Sachs, 2005), Bush's PEPFAR plan requires that a significant proportion of US funding must be spent on abstinence only prevention efforts. This means that in many cases struggling health systems have had to cut spending to more necessary areas in order to fulfill US demands.

Of the 15 "focus countries" -- 12 African countries, plus Haiti, Guyana and Vietnam -- nine reduced the amount of money for programs to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV in their 2006 budgets to meet the spending target for abstinence promotion.

In one, mother-to-child funding was cut from $1.4 million to $1 million, and in another it was reduced by $300,000, said GAO's David Gootnick, who oversaw the report.

In perhaps the largest adjustment, one country cut from $8 million to $4 million its spending on prevention services for couples in which one person has HIV infection and the other does not -- an extremely high-risk group -- as well as on sexually active youths and sex workers.

I graduated!

My aunt Meriel, my gran, me and my mum celebrating my MSc graduation :)

Last day in the Gambia

Maz and I with our wonderful taxi driver Pappe Jazz

Crossing the Gambia & Senegal

Sunrise on the Gambian River

Leaving the ferry on the farside of the river

Sunburned but smiling

We packed so much into the past few days that it's gone by in a total blur. On Sunday we walked round the Abuko nature reserve - before we walked in our taxi driver asked if we wanted him to drive round to the exit to pick us up or if we wanted to walk back to the entrance - we foolishly told him we were perfectly capapble fo walking back and set off. Gambia is really famous for the variety of birds here, and we saw some really beautiful ones, but were much more impressed by the massive crocodiles along the banks. At about the 33rd marker I started to feel a bit tired and asked our guide how much further the walk was - he laughed and said there were 107 markers till the end! We kept going and at about the 1/2 way point stopped at the animal rehab house, had a drink and snapped a few pics of the alarmingly close hyena family. The last 1/2 I walked fast to reach the end as soon as possible, and have never been so happy as to see our taxi driver waiting patiently for us. Maz and I jumped in and were happy to be off when we were told the Nigerian president was about to pass and we couldn't leave until he had done so... about 20 minutes later a parade of cars filed past and we were finally on our way.

We met up with the Gambian family of one of Maz'z coworkers on Sunday evening and they have been taking brilliant care of us - guiding us to places we never would have found on our own, explaining the country from a locals point of view and even feeding us a wonderful Gambian dinner of fish, plassus and rice last night. They live so far away from where we are staying on the coast that it took a couple of hours by gellah-gellah to get back last night, but it was a much more relaxing trip than the dalla-dallas of Tanzania (for a start everyone had their own seat!).

Today I decided to take a break from all the hectic site-seeing to spend some time on the beach and am decidedly pink as a result!

Future football stars

Children in the Gambia

The family that made us feel welcome in the Gambia

Just as close as they appear

Gambia Maybe Time

Hello from hot and sunny Kotu Beach, the Gambia. Maz and I left the absolutely freezing streets of London yesterday morning thinking it wouldn't be possible to survive in temperatures any colder and spent the evening walking a long the beach barefoot. The cold that I had when I left England has almost dissappeared with the warm weather.

We had heard quite a lot about sex tourism here before we came (as has just about everyone it seems!), though watching the middle age women with boys 1/2 their age is a sight that can only really be seen to be believed. Thanks to this wonderful practice, we've found it completely impossible to walk anywhere unaccompanied by 'bumsters' who seem harmless but are rather irritating. This morning we went to the markets in Serrekundu (the largest city in the Gambia) and spent an hour or so walking round with a constant companion telling us "relax and take it easy, I'm not hassling you," If that is so, I dread to think what hassling is!

Now that we've missed the peak sun hours, we'll spent the afternoon lounging on the beach and relaxing :)

The Western Sahara by air

Some good news in the new year?

Today Justin Gillis wrote that a Once-a-Day AIDS Pill Could Be Ready Soon in the Washington Post. This is, ofcourse, good news. Having to take only one pill a day means treatment regimens are easier to maintain, patients won't get as sick and drug resistant strains are less likely to develop. Though "[t]he pill won't be ideal for women of child-bearing age, since it may cause birth defects." The group most affected by HIV/AIDS worldwide, won't be able to use this new drug. The eternal cynic in me noticed this sentence:

"With nearly two dozen AIDS drugs on the market, with many more on the way, and with the patients taking them expecting to live out normal life spans, companies say devising convenient regimens has become a make-or-break problem."

and it made me wonder: isn't this the perfect market for drug companies? I know it's been said before, but an ever-increasing population forced to maintain drug regimens for their entire natural life, it all seems too perfect. What incentive do pharmaceutical companies have to develop a cure for AIDS? No matter how hard we try to treat the rapidly multiplying numbers of people affected by HIV/AIDS in developing countries, until there is a cure the poorest will continue to have far higher HIV infection and AIDS mortality rates.

The Post also reports that the NIH Halts International AIDS Study testing whether breaks from anti-retroviral drugs had an effect on drug effectiveness. Unsurprisingly, the trial "showed that patients had twice the risk of dying or developing clinical AIDS if they took breaks from the drug cocktails, called highly active antiretroviral therapy." This has major implications for donor agencies funding treatment in developing countries. While there are now several programmes offering developing countries assistance for ART (anti-retroviral treatment) that are expected to increase their investment in the coming years, it is crucial that these programmes don't, as all too often happens, have their funding cut in future budgets. Pressure must be kept up to ensure that the Global Fund, the WHO's 3*5, and other AIDS treatment programmes are maintained as even short breaks in treatment can increase the development of drug resistant HIV strains, cause earlier AIDS onset and more illness for those with HIV/AIDS.

African Women Confront Bush’s AIDS Policy

Yifat Susskind of Foreign Policy in Focus writes:

...[G]rowing numbers of people around the world know that sub-Saharan Africa is the epicenter of the AIDS pandemic: three-quarters of AIDS deaths worldwide have been in Africa, and today the continent is home to nearly two-thirds of all of those who are HIV-positive (more than 25 million people). Fewer people know that most Africans living with HIV/AIDS are women, and that young women are now being infected at a rate three to four times higher than young men. For many, this information is absorbed through a mesh of stereotypes that make human misery
seem like a natural condition of life in Africa .

But while AIDS—like the litany of this year's natural disasters—may have originated in nature, the magnitude of its destruction is a man-made catastrophe. Consider the following:

• Since the 1980s when AIDS first emerged, the United States has demanded “economic austerity measures” in impoverished countries. In Africa , these policies cut national health budgets in half just when public health systems needed to be ramped up to combat AIDS. Today, the pandemic is the single
  greatest obstacle to economic development in Africa .
• To bolster already-huge profits of U.S. pharmaceutical companies, the Bush administration has blocked the sale of affordable generic drugs that have saved millions of lives in rich countries.
• Women are made particularly vulnerable to HIV infection because they are denied the rights to refuse sex or insist on condom use. As the majority of those living in poverty and the poorest of the poor, women are more likely to contract HIV and more likely to develop symptoms of AIDS soon after they are infected.

AIDS, unjust economic policies, and women's inequality are mutually reinforcing crises; combating any one of these requires addressing them together. But too often, public health programs, government policies, and even activists compartmentalize issues, missing critical points of inter-connection that are keys to effecting change.

AIDS in DC

The press coverage yesterday was depressingly scarce. 18 years of World AIDS Days and I guess everyone just doesn't care anymore.

Today the Washington Post's Darragh Johnson talked about the Whitman Walker clinic's mobile testing unit that was out on the streets yesterday. Despite the fact that:

Washington's rate of infection is alarmingly high -- at Whitman-Walker's clinic in Southeast the positive test rate is 6 percent -- and it's not going down. In 2001, in cities with more than a half-million residents, the relative numbers of Washingtonians infected with AIDS outpaced the country's other big cities, according to a thick report on "HIV/AIDS in the Nation's Capital," released in August by D.C. Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, a public interest organization.

So. To recap. Each of the numbers below represents the number of AIDS cases per 100,000 residents in 2001:

Washington -- 119

Baltimore -- 117

San Francisco -- 67

New York -- 64

Philadelphia -- 58

In 2003, two years later, D.C.'s number had jumped to 170.

(Johnson [2005] "In a City With A Big Problem, Trying to
Turn A Corner on AIDS" The Washington Post 2Dec05 )

Noone wants to get tested. The mobile testing unit spent the day hanging out and encouraging people to come and find out their status, but to little effect.

*

Some good news: Yesterday the Guardian reported:

Europe, led by the UK, last night signalled a major split with the United States over curbing the Aids pandemic in a statement that tacitly urged African governments not to heed the abstinence-focused agenda of the Bush administration.

(Bosely [2005] "Europeans reject abstinence message
in split with US on Aids " The Guardian 1Dec05)