28 November 2005


One of the many canals in Amsterdam, taken by the lovely Maz (while I stayed in and wrote my paper!) Posted by Picasa

Patti Smith & other Adventures in Amsterdam

On Thursday I arrived in Amsterdam... and wow. This just really seems to be the city of the future. It's kind of hard to believe that the Dutch have got it so right... I mean, what on earth are we doing in the rest of the world? Granted, I've only been here a few days, but the overall impression is one of serenity and efficiency. Public transportation is great, police presence verging on nill, and despite what you would think, no public 'scenes' so endemic of US/UK societies on a weekend.

Maz and I have had a wonderful time relaxing and catching up the past few days. On Saturday we went to see Patti Smith at Paradiso which is a converted church and must be the coolest place to see a gig ever. I've never really listened to Patti much, but she was incredible live. Despite being a living legend, she has to be the most unaffected musician ever (and yeah, I'm including all the musicians I know that aren't anywhere close to being a legend!).

The hostel is a bit dull, but clean and warm (and at 27 I think maybe that should be my main criteria for hostelling). The red light district was a strange sight, the city goes from picturesque to ummmm pornographic in a few steps. But crime seems to be a lot lower and we did find our fave hang out spot of the weekend slap bang in the middle (just in case you're concerned, I am leaving with far less money than I arrived with!).

I don't think I've ever had such a great weekend :)

23 November 2005

Morality and AIDS

It has been far too long since I last posted... somehow every day life never seems to compare to the urgency and immediacy of travelling. I always find I am thinking much more deeply about things and write far more in a new environment than I do at 'home' - wherever that may be at the time.

I just had an email asking me if I didn't think 'moral issues' were at the root of the AIDS epidemic in Africa. No - I don't. I think the root cause of AIDS is a particularly clever 'germ' that has learned to spread through sex (or human reproduction) something we humans are highly embarrassed about and something we will continue to do, furtively and otherwise, until we are extinct. I'm not a biologist and can't document the way the virus has evolved and spreads biologically, but would recommend reading Guns, Germs and Steel to see how germs develop and AIDS in the 21st Century for more on the biological transmission of the virus.

I can tell you that women are much more vulnerable to infection (both biologically and socio-economically) and that poverty is a major factor in the spread of HIV/AIDS. Conditions of poverty lead to poor nutrition, higher exposure to disease and suppressed immune responses. A compromised immune system is much less able to resist the attack of the HIV virus. Poverty also decreases options. Faced with the choice between starvation and possible illness later, most people concentrate on short-term survival. This pushes millions of women around the world into sex work, and millions more into dependent relationships.

The reason why Africa, as opposed to say the US, is the most heavily affected region is due to many, many reasons, but not 'morals.' Probably the two most important are the level of extreme poverty (in sub-Saharan Africa, 83% of children are severely deprived of at least one basic human need: food, safe drinking water, sanitation, health care, education, shelter) and that health care is minimal and treatment rare. Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest percentage of untreated STI's: it has been proven that untreated STI's increase transmission risk. HIV is far more likely to be transmitted just after infection and in the final stages of the disease (when viral loads are high), treatment reduces viral loads and thereby decreases new infections. Treatment also acts as a deterrant by reducing stigma and encouraging testing; those who have an incentive to protect themselves if HIV-negative and the knowledge to protect others if HIV-positive.

"As so many of our patients have noted, what is the motivation for learning one’s serostatus [HIV status] when there is no possibility of being treated for opportunistic infections or of access to prevention of mother-to-child transmission during pregnancy, much less of being treated with antiretrovirals when needed?"
(Castro and Farmer (2005) “Understanding and Addressing AIDS-Related Stigma: from Anthropological Theory to Clinical Practice in Haiti” American Journal of Public Health Vol. 95, No.1 pp.53-59)
It is noteworthy that the most common AIDS-related assistance to heavily burdened countries has consisted of education about the disease and condom distribution to prevent HIV transmission. Many of those at greatest risk know that HIV is a sexually transmitted disease and that condoms can prevent transmission.

Their risk stems less from ignorance and more from the precarious situations in which hundreds of millions live; gender inequality adds a special burden, and is the main reason that, globally, HIV incidence is now higher among women than among men.
(Farmer et al., (2001) “Community Based Approaches to HIV Treatment in Resource-Poor Settings” The Lancet Vol. 358 pp.404-409)

The prevention strategies currently used will not stop HIV incidence or AIDS deaths among the poorest populations, especially among poor women. It is time to focus attention on treating the millions already affected, both as a moral necessity and a wise investment in the future. Treatment, both antiretroviral and for opportunistic infections, must become integrated in the fight to combat HIV/AIDS in all countries and in all communities.